The FBA opposed our motion not to install the beA for two of our colleagues on November 27, 2015 by only giving a two-line mention. To read the copy of the text click here.
On November 22, 2015 we asked by way of interlocutory procedures (reference number I AGH 17/15 and reference number II AGH 16/15), the FBA to desist from installing ready-to-receive the beA for two colleagues of our law office without a first registration. To read the copy of our urgent motion (reference number I AGH 17/15) click here.
Update from February 22,2016 (document from February 19,2016):
To prepare the hearing before the Lawyers' Court, we sent out statement from February 19, 2016 to the Court. To read our statement click here.
Update from February 24, 2016(court hearing on February 24, 2016 and on March 3, 2016)
The first senate scheduled the verbal negotiations for the fast track proceedings initiated by Dr. Marcus Werner on Thursday March 03, 2016. Click here to read the summons.
The II senate postponed the verbal negotiations for the fast track proceedings initiated by our colleague Hoppe on Wednesday February 24, 2016. Click here the read about the shift in the new date. By letter dated January 18, 2016 the BRAK stated that Mr. Hoppe's 'beA' will not be ready-to-receive until the end of the urgent procedure. Thus the BRAK is going further than requested by the II senate that is they decided not to install the 'beA'.
Update from January 15, 2016 (value in dispute)
In the meantime we received several responses to the actions from the AGH Berlin. The applications presented by two of our colleagues will be examined by different senates of the AGH Berlin.
The application presented by Dr. Werner will be before the first senate. The first senate made the following request to the BRAK on December 29, 2015: the BRAK should guarantee until the main proceedings are concluded or to March 31, 2016 that they will not install the 'beA' for Dr. Werner. Click here to read the whole text of the decision made by the first senate. Further the first senate defined the quarrel value up to 2.500€. On December 29, 2015. Click here to read the copy of the whole text.
The application presented by Mr. Hoppe will be before the second senate. On January 6, 2015 the second senate combined Mr. Hoppe's application with another one and scheduled verbal negotiations on February 17, 2016. Click here to read the whole summons for the date. Further the II senate pointed out that they are responsible for all legal questions regarding the 'beA' and that in the verbal negotiations will be decided if it is correct to use the 'beA' for legal transactions before January 1, 2018 without the attorneys having a special 'beA card'. Also the II senate sough the assurance that there will be no 'beA' installed for Mr. Hoppe until the end of the verbal negotiations. Otherwise the II senate will take other measures against the BRAK. Click here to read the whole text of the injunction.